Whatsapp-Pink-The-new-virus-in-whatsapp-3

WhatsApp Pink: A New Virus Spreading Through WhatsApp Group Chats

WhatsApp Pink: A New Virus Spreading Through WhatsApp Group Chats

A malicious link is being distributed on WhatsApp groups that pretend to change to a theme of the Whatsapp chat to a pink-coloured one. Beneath the title WhatsApp Pink, the link is, in reality, an effort by hackers to win control over a targeted device.

The newly-discovered Android nasty was first reported by a Cybersecurity researcher Rajshekhar Rajaharia (Twitter ID: @Rajaharia). He informed about this malicious on Twitter and wrote “Beware of WhatsApp Pink!! A Virus is being spread in Whatsapp groups with an APK download link. Don’t click any link with the name of #WhatsappPink. Complete access to your phone will be lost”, and also shared several screenshots exposing the interface of the malicious app, which appears to be similar to the original app. It seems to have been first spotted in India, where it was distributed in multiple large chat groups on popular instant messaging services.

The new virus link which is advertised under the name Whatsapp Pink pretends that it can transform the theme of WhatsApp from its iconic green to pink colour. Additionally, awards added features to attract victims. Several WhatsApp users recently reported experiencing such a link on their phones, while many have forwarded it further without understanding its true goal.

Once the installation process is finished and the user clicks on “WhatsApp Pink”, the app disappears itself, declaring that it was never even installed on your device. The victim will next experience a message, to which they need to reply to unconsciously cause the virus to develop further. This link can probably lock the victims out of their WhatsApp accounts or indeed their smartphones in some cases. The specialist advises that the link is critical enough to permit the hacker to earn complete access to your phone and its data.

If you have already downloaded “WhatsApp Pink” you can either delete it through Settings and the App Manager submenu or install a full-featured Android security solution that scans your device and remove it automatically.

Facebook-‘Accidentally’-Banned-ResignModi-Hashtag-Govt-says-Din’t-Ask-For-It

Facebook ‘Accidentally’ Banned #ResignModi Hashtag; Govt says Din’t Ask For It

Facebook ‘Accidentally’ Banned #ResignModi Hashtag; Govt says Din’t Ask For It

Amid a rise in coronavirus cases, few netizens took to social media to criticize the government and demand Prime Minister Narendra Modi to step down over the government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic on its platform with a hashtag #ResignModi.

The hashtag #ResignModi was trending on social media. Subsequently, Social media giant Facebook blocked the #ResignModi hashtag for several hours on Wednesday, 28 April, censoring over 12,000 posts critical of the ruling BJP government, as the second stream of COVID-19 turned into a disastrous public health danger in the country.

The Facebook users who tried to view the hashtag were flashed with a notice saying that such posts had been “temporarily hidden here” as some content in those posts went against the website’s “Community Standards.”

In a statement provided to The Verge late on Wednesday, Facebook said it has now replaced the posts and the hashtag was blocked “by mistake”. “We temporarily blocked this hashtag by mistake, not because the Indian government asked us to, and have since restored it,” a Facebook spokesperson said. Facebook also stated that the block was the effect of some of the content that used the hashtag, “but did not specify what kind of content”.

Signal-or-whatsapp2

Signal or WhatsApp? Here’s how these apps differ and help you decide which one to use.

Signal or WhatsApp? Here's how these apps differ and help you decide which one to use.

Whatsapp vs Signal: A Rundown (2021)

Currently, WhatsApp is the largest messaging service in the world with over 2 billion monthly active users. Following that, Signal stands at a point of 10-20 million monthly active users. Studying these numbers, it’s clear to the world that WhatsApp is widely popular and while Signal appears to have just touched the million downloads race. Having said that, numbers don’t tell you everything and that’s why Vibrand Digital Solutions bring you a detailed difference between WhatsApp and Signal.

Currently, the latest update from the Slant community is while comparing Whatsapp vs Signal, it recommends Signal for most people. In the latest trending question “What is the best team chat software?” The Signal app is rated in the 2nd position while Whatsapp is rated 31st. The most relevant purpose the world chooses Signal is: Signal works on an advanced end to end encryption protocol that gives privacy for every message every time.

Now with all that said, let’s run through the article and find out why Signal is better than WhatsApp.

1. Signal has more further up-to-date security features

New security features appear first in Signal app. Examples include, Signal has disappearing messages – which are automatically deleted after a specific period – since 2016. On the other hand, this feature is still being experimented with a small number of WhatsApp users.

Other important and beta Signal highlights that WhatsApp users don’t have include:

Signal additionally owns a slightly wider array of clients, with a dedicated client for Linux desktop users – suitable to appeal to those in the security and data analysis areas while WhatsApp guides them to its web app.

2. Signal is open-source

All source code of Signal is issued for anyone to check and practice under a GPLv3 license for clients. And an AGPLv3 license for the server. This signifies that you are allowed to observe what’s operating on inside it – or, more usefully, completely depend on the specialist expertise of people who examine the code and know exactly what they’re looking for.

3. Signal has limited potential for hidden vulnerabilities

WhatsApp being a larger platform, it is more appealing to malicious actors to attack. But the reality is that its codebase is a restrictive closed box indicating that it may demand a longer time for discovering any dangerous vulnerabilities. The truth is that any application can and eventually will suffer vulnerabilities – Signal has fixed some of its own.

On the other hand, WhatsApp’s closed-source code (beyond its use of the open Signal protocol) signifies that several potential targets remain unknown until they are employed. A troubling example that happened in 2019 was a vulnerability in WhatsApp’s VoIP stack, practiced by intelligence firms to implant spyware.

4. You can run your own Signal server (but apparently shouldn’t)

Here’s an extra benefit of open-source software that you can operate with if you are that way willing. It is really not necessary or demand a Signal server of your own for personal or for business purposes. It’s created as a bulk communications platform and is not truly meant to scale down, it’s difficult to develop and currently does not have any containerized versions for effortless deployment.

However, if you are technically minded, you will be able to discover much more regarding how a system operates by developing a test case and poking it with a stick. It is non-trivial, though community guides are available to serve users to get a Signal server up for running and few fascinating streams exist, including a decentralised messaging system.

5. How much can you trust Facebook?

The most reasonable purpose to use Signal rather than WhatsApp is Facebook’s long-standing lack of respect for its user’s privacy. Facebook has shocking records of data collection and handling, from the Cambridge Analytica affair to its system of distributing data of users with phone companies.

Under EU law, it’s previously explained that Facebook cannot be trusted with WhatsApp user data that should have survived privately. In 2017, European governors took action on Facebook for distributing the WhatsApp user’s phone numbers with the Facebook social channels for promotion purposes. For the violation of data protection regulations, it was an opt-out rather than an opt-in system. Earlier Facebook had claimed that such a mechanism would never be executed.